Thursday, 14 March 2013

Leave Kristen Stewart Alone

This instruction for this week's Theme Thursday was to write about something controversial.

I should preface this piece by saying that I don't really know much about Kristen Stewart.  I know so very little about her that I actually had to google her just now to double check she is in fact KRIsten Stewart and not KIRsten Stewart.  True story there, and no, that's not the controversial part.

I read the Twilight books years ago, when they first came out, and I loved them.  No, that's not the controversial part either!  I enjoyed the first one more so than the rest, but isn't that always the way?  I devoured it in two sittings and immediately went back for more. I'd had absolutely no preconceptions about the book, no one had recommended it, and I knew very little about it, other than that it was about vampires.  So I was pleasantly surprised, and it was just what I was looking for at the time, something easy to read with a bit of escapism thrown in.  I have never seen any of the Twilight films, because I don't do watching films of books I've enjoyed.

I also don't live in a cave though so I am aware that Kristen Stewart is an actress who is famous for playing Bella who also had (has?) an off-screen relationship with Robert Pattinson, who played Edward.  That's pretty much where my awareness of her would have ended but then she had an affair with Rupert Sanders, a married man with children.  And suddenly people had all kinds of opinions they wanted to share with me, and I was seeing magazines everywhere with her face and his face, and his wife's face, and Robert Pattinson's face, and then some outsider's view on what had happened, and what might happen next and who was right and who was wrong.

I read a few of the articles and I listened to what people had to say, all the while thinking "What.The.Fuck?!"

I want you to know that I do not think it's ok to have an affair.  I don't think it's ok to kiss someone when you're in a relationship with someone else, regardless of whether the paparazzi may or may not snap you.  Unless you have an open relationship, and you know your partner will be cool with it, but in that case, it wouldn't be an affair would it?!  I don't think it's ok to sleep with someone, when you're in a relationship with someone else.  I don't think it's generally a good idea to have affairs with married men or women, and I think it's really unfortunate when there are children involved too.  Do you know what else I think? I think no one really knows what goes on in ANY relationship apart from the two people in that relationship.  And do you know what else I think? I think that it takes two to Tango.  And indeed, to have an affair.

A couple of articles I read made a vague, almost disinterested nod to Rupert Sanders involvement, how he was full of regret for hurting his wife and children, and hoping to repair the damage to his marriage. But for the most part it was about her.  Kristen Stewart.  The other woman, the homewrecker, the evil troll breaking the heart of one of the biggest teen heartthrobs in recent history.  Don't get me wrong, I didn't want to see Rupert Sanders dragged over hot coals.  In fact, I'd have been happy knowing nothing about any of it quite frankly, but since I apparently had no choice in that matter, I would have at least liked to see some balance.

Something like: "a man and a woman who were romantically involved with other people, had sex with each other. This story is as old as time itself.  It's extremely sad for everyone involved.  Both individuals are presumably equally at fault and (it would appear) very remorseful and keen to apologise.  It's really none of our business."

I don't think Kristen Stewart needs me to defend her.  I'm sure (I hope) she had support from family and friends, who maybe said things like "Oh my god, are you okay? What's going on?  Do you love this guy? He's a married man, with children...you might have lost your relationship over this, and damaged your reputation as an actress too. But you're only human.  We'll be here for you when the media rip you to shreds.  We'll support you whatever you decide.  We love you" or whatever. The kind of things I'd say to a friend, or sister in a similar situation.  The kind of things I'd want someone to say to me under those circumstances.

Of course, we, the general public, are not her friends, apparently we're judge, jury and executioner of her private life and problems.  But "Ah-ha!", I hear you cry, "when she put herself in the public eye, she lost that right to privacy!"

Did she?! Yes she put herself out there for judgement- as an actress.  So we get to judge her, as an actress.  If she was an ambassador for fidelity maybe we should be suggesting her resignation. But she isn't.  She's an actress. A 22 year old girl (she's the same age as my little sister ffs!)  She's a human being.  A fact that some of the people ripping her to shreds in the media and online seem to have forgotten.

The more people around me voiced their opinions on the matter, the more I began to see it as almost an issue of equality...

Men who have affairs, they're philanderers, they get a slapped wrist, a cursory mention in the article, and are expected to hang their head in shame and keep in in their pants (for a while at least), but in a way, it's almost like we expect it of them.  And that's actually really sad in itself, and probably an entire other post, hell book, would be needed to cover it.  Women who have affairs on the other hand, they're evil. The very root of all that is wrong with the world. Tempting a wholesome man away from his wife and children with their wiley ways and breaking men's hearts.  Is there no end to their wickedness?!

Erm. The last I checked it was March 2013, not Genesis 3.

Have we really not progressed beyond the idea of women as temptresses, who must be faithful and pure and held to higher standards than men?

How sad.

I don't condone people having affairs, although ultimately, outside of my own relationship, who does what with who is not really any of my concern.  I don't have any strong feelings, or indeed, feelings at all about any of the people who were involved in this particular 'public event', since that's what it became.  I don't underestimate the consequences of an affair on everyone involved.  But I also don't think that we, as outsiders get to decide who are the "goodies" and "baddies"(to borrow my 3 year olds terminology there) in these very private, very personal (no matter how public) battles. Particularly when society appears to always demonise the cheating female regardless.





That was me, being deliberately controversial on my blog for the first time ever.  Want more controversy?! Click the squiggly button! You know you want to ;)




10 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. :) I wonder if there IS an ambassador for fidelity...should totally have checked that out first. Hehe.

      Delete
  2. It's the old double standard, the man is a bit of a lad, the woman is a filthy whore. It's a man' s world, Rebecca. The sooner that changes, the better. Unfortunately, it will be a long slow process.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's sad that it's 2013 and double standards not only still EXIST but are so ingrained in the public conscious that people don't even realise that they're perpetuating them. Not at all related to Kristen Stewart or her love life, but I was reading this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/mar/14/virago-changed-publishers-attitudes-women?CMP=twt_gu this morning about women and publishing, one of the parts I found most interesting was about women writing male lead characters increasing their book's success. I thought you might find it interesting because that's the exact opposite of what you've done in Due Diligance isn't it? (I know I haven't read it yet but from what Emma has told me.) I hadn't even *considered* that the gender of the protagonist could have such an impact.

      Delete
  3. She broke the heart of America's heartthrob. So everyone gets to hate her. (Not that I agree with it)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh I don't know, I bet Rupert Sanders had a hand in it ;)

    You know what would be really interesting- asking Robert Pattinson at the time who he felt most betrayed by- I bet he would have said Kristen Stewart, because after all, SHE was the one he was in a relationship with, Rupert Sanders didn't owe him anything, except, well, you know, common decency.

    Then to ask Liberty Ross who she felt most betrayed by, and I just bet she'd have said Kristen Stewart too, even though as far as I'm aware, Kristen Stewart hadn't promised her anything, unlike her husband who presumably made some vows at some point...It just seems like it's always "The Other Woman" who takes the brunt of the nastiness surrounding any affair. And no, I've never been "The Other Woman" in case anyone reading this was wondering if I have an agenda ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is the heart of why I rarely even KNOW or remember celebrity names. I just don't care. I don't want to know their private details. They don't even know I exist and beyond whatever story they may act out (or song they sing), that is the limit to our relationship as it were. Maybe I have broken brain cells but I just don't care about people I don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You'd think in this day and age that old double standard would be a thing of the past. Nope. She's apparently a house-wrecking whore, while he....has mostly been overlooked and managed to fly under the public's radar. Since it takes two to tango, why is all the focus on her? Because society is still stuck in that old-fashioned mindset

    Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yeah, I hate when people throw celebrity news at me because I couldn't care one whit what happens in the lives of people I do not know. Especially when it comes to divorce and what-not.

    When I started reading your post, I thought you were going to make a case for people to stop teasing Kristen Stewart about her lack of emotional repertoire - which is all I know about her based on the jokes going around Facebook comparing her to Grumpy Cat.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Just like Angelina J. She was the homewrecker. The temptress. Whatever. I honestly don't feel sorry for anyone but the children. We all have choices. Choices have consequences. Sometimes people cheat because they WANT to get caught. It's true. It's easier form them to put the decision in their partner's hands than have to admit or face the reality that they're unhappy. I'm not saying this is the case here. I don't know. I can say that the bigger of a deal the media makes of a story, the less I give a shit about it. I totally tune it out. It's refreshing to read a post that isn't all KIRsten bashing though. Or whatever her name is. ;-)

    ReplyDelete